« Little things | Main | An embarrassment »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341e992c53ef00e551c936298834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pick-and-choose:

Comments

V

No relation with this post; but here is a great chart : http://pixdaus.com/single.php?id=37189&frm=krsn

GJ

I would argue that Sirota's chart is ineffective as well. Although it is better than Gelman's chart, Sirota's chart lacks proper labeling and isn't reader friendly. For the most part, we're making charts to help the average person understand a topic, not chart junkies. And then there is the orange line. The reader shouldn't have to guess what it means. By the way, I don't know what it means. Maybe the reflects poorly on me. Sirota uses the percentage of the black population for the horizontal axis, but labels it in an obscure way. Why not just label it with a percentage sign? Same thing with the vertical axis. A lot of people will not take the time to dissect a chart if it requires a lot of work to interpret it. We're making charts to be read and understood after all. I would label the vertical axis as percentage of the vote and keep the win/lose line running horizontally. Another fault is that Sirota totally disregards the black vote. I then would propose color coding the votes for white and black people. So two dots for each state. That will better show the the "race chasm." Plotting only white voters does not give us any insight into the black vote. For all the reader knows, the black voters voted the same way as white voters. To further help the readability of the chart, I would create a grid in five percent intervals to help the reader interpret the value of each dot. I would run a .5 pt gray line for 10 percent intervals and a .25 pt gray line for the five percent intervals in between those. Using the gray lines will cut down on visual noise. For the major axis lines I would use a 1 pt. black line. This will dramatically improve the readability of the chart. Also, the only states I would disregard are Michigan and Florida. They were the only states to screw up their primaries.

GJ

Sorry, I transposed the two names. I was referring to Nyhan's chart, not Sirota's.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Vimeo and NYU. See my full bio.

Book Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read



Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter

Residues