« More prevalent versus more likely | Main | Mid-week entertainment: dogma »



You must include this WSJ chart - the best fit line misses almost all the data.



It looks like the gray hues are grouping what the author is judging to be healthy and unhealthy. Soda, beer, and coffee one color, and juice, sports drinks, and milk another. I agree that it's confusing because I could think of arguments to change the beverages in each group.


Anyone who expects more than agitprop and fishwrap from the WSJ editorial page is confused. They deserve Murdoch, and vice-versa.

FD: not that it matters, but Norway's datum in that chart is wrong, due to an energy-excise tax.

Zuil Serip

I agree with Matthew that the WSJ chart is of historic dishonesty. In fact I left a post commenting on this very chart on Tufte's site a couple of days ago:

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Columbia. See my full bio.

Book Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read

Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter