« Where are the crimes? | Main | Graphical equity 2 »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341e992c53ef00d834b80c2c53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Graphical equity 1:

Comments

Steve Conover

Are you classifying the column chart above as "junk"? If so, what are you proposing as a superior alternative?

Jon Peltier

You can overcome the stated shortcoming of Marimekko charts by adding a "Total" stack to the right of the main chart, as shown on this page:

http://peltiertech.com/Excel/Commentary/GraphicalEquity1.html

Hadley

The "statistical" name for Marimekko plots are mosaic plots. You may be interested in a close relative, the fluctuation diagram, which doesn't have the implicit conditionining of the mosaic plot.

Mondrian has nice interactive implementations of both of these.

Zuil

The Energy Information Agency often uses energy flow diagrams that I find a much more compelling way to convey this type of information. C.f. http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/pdf/pages/sec8_3.pdf

Kaiser

Steve: I like the Marimekko better than the network graph chart but at the same time, the Marimekko has its problems. I'm hoping readers like Jon would come up with ideas. Stay tuned.

Hadley: I've seen mosaic plots for visualizing categorical variables, and the marimekko is indeed an extension of those to continuous variables.

lope

Zuil: Unfortunately with the energy flow diagram you linked to, it doesn't reveal what percentage of all nuclear energy is used by residential, commercial, industrial etc. Same for petroleum, coal, renewable etc. Still, it conveys a lot of information in a very effective way.

Zuil

Lope: I linked to the “Flow” or “Sankey” diagram as an example of the approach, not for its data. I do agree that is would be more enlightening if the data were represented as percentages, though that could be done very easily.

I wonder why the EIA used the chart that Keiser linked to, rather that using the Sankey diagram it typically does… Perhaps it was due to a misguided belief that Sankey diagrams are too “technical” for a general audience… If so, I very much disagree. Though often difficult to draw, Sankey diagrams are IMHO unbeatable to represent any type of lossless flow (energy, money, fluids, etc).

Lope

"I wonder why the EIA used the chart that Keiser linked to, rather that using the Sankey diagram it typically does?"

Size constraints maybe? If you go to this link http://www.eia.doe.gov/overview_hd.html they did use it, but it's very difficult to make out the text. Maybe Sankey diagrams need to have a lot of space to be effective.

I agree with you, I prefer the Sankey diagram. It's more fun, draws me in.

Hadley

Oh, I wasn't paying attention to the chart - it's not a mosaic plot, but a stacked spinogram. But please stop calling it Marimekko - this is Marimekko.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Vimeo and NYU. See my full bio.

Book Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read



Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter

Residues