« Graphical equity 2 | Main | Higher, higher and higher »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341e992c53ef00d834b994e353ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference For love of Color:

Comments

Clint

The asterisk would seem to indicate planetary satellites.

Non planetary and non satellite objects are indicated by the numeric prefix to the name.

stochastix

Powers that be at Wikipedia? Derek C. can just go and edit the page himself if he doesn't like the current chart. Isn't that the whole point of Wikipedia?

But in any case, I agree that the original chart is UGLY!

derek c

I had said to Kaiser in my email that I might pop it on Wikipedia when I had time and energy, but I haven;t done it yet. I may have used the word "submit" or something, because the whole point of wikis is that what you feel like putting on, someone else might feel like taking off. Everyone's a critic :-)

Personally, I have a lot of respect for the editors' sensibilities, and so I rarely make actual substantial changes myself, but instead post a proposal to make a change in the "Talk" section. If not a single soul feels moved to say "Yay!", it probably wasn't such a vital necessity after all.

cscmike

Indeed, everyone is a critic. But, the purpose of critique on Wikipedia isn't to spark endless bitching sessions, but rather, in the most democratic of ways, to make each page as good as it can be. If you've got something better (which you plainly do, Derek), post it. You may not get much from the Talk section of the page, but, this forum has already lauded your superior efforts. If you do find the time to post it, you'll be using your expertise to improve the page, which is what wiki is all about.

derek

All right! All right! I've done it :-)

I would have uploaded it at 1000 or 1200 pixels size, but the dreadful 800-pixel version is automatic, and of worse quality than 800 pixels has to be, so I made my version 1600 pixels in an attempt to make the "compressed" version as good as it can be (the compression is strictly 2:1, so it shouldn't introduce any artifacts). Click through for the hig-res original.

Clint

Derek, nicely done.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Vimeo and NYU. See my full bio.

Book Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read



Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter

Residues