« Rushing to judgement | Main | Much data, zero info »



Also, getting rid of those stupid and distracting pictures. It would not have been so bad if they all occupied rectangles of equal size, but one is a rectangle, the next is a quadrangle that leads the eye upwards from the first, and the third is some sort of weird house shape. The whole collection makes it impossible to compare the lines because of the optical illusions caused by the strong picture envelopes.

Even if they had all been rectangles of equal size, there would have been a danger of optical dragging that can be caused by one picture being stronger than another.

Sérgio N

Great blog! One of my recent findings. Thanks!

Btw, what software do you use to plot your graphics?

Jon Peltier

The bottom chart, split into thirds to allow for selective price labels, loses more information in terms of vertical resolution. Too great a price to pay for hardly relevant price information. If you can so easily follow the trends, as in the first reworking of the data, then the closing price built into a series data label is the only price that's really necessary.

Jens Meiert

Quite a good chart junk example. Though, you could of course improve the combined chart (#2) by slightly different lines in case they're viewed/printed without color.


Minor point, but isn't the middle chart mislabeled? It appears that Walgreens and Rite-Aid got switched.


Thanks Merle. It's great to know that some of you are reading the details. I fixed the chart titles.


Hate to say it, but there seems to be some basic problem with your charts - i.e., Walgreen's is at 49.64 as I write this, but your chart says it closed recently at 4.51; Rite-Aid is now at 4.72, but the chart has a recent 51.48. Did you by any chance fix the info around the wrong way?


Fixed the wrong chart! This set should be right.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


Link to Principal Analytics Prep

See our curriculum, instructors. Apply.
Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Columbia. See my full bio.

Book Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read

Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter