« Unscientific poll? | Main | Tracks »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341e992c53ef00d834e55da869e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The dots don't connect:

Comments

atom probe

I don't mind the decimal. It is drawn with that precision (as can be seen by suble variation in bar lengths that differ by a fraction of a percent) and the source data can have that precision. It can be argued that such precision helps emphasize the point, as even Britain has slightly more insider investing than the U.S. (if that was the point of the plot)

Additionaly, the chart seems to be used as evidence for an alternate hypothesis. The quote from the article claims that xenophobia isn't to blame. The chart proposes that the reason is that insider investing in international stock prevents outsider investing--that the available supply of international stock is smaller significantly smaller.

While I would agree that more evidence should be presented in support of this hypothesis, I do think this chart helps to illustrate that point. (Naturally, this would fall apart if the article presented some third hypothesis which wasn't xenophobia or scarcity of foreign stock because of insider investing).

My only nit about the chart is that it emphasizes the bar for the U.S. (by bolding the text and the darker coloring for the bar). This would seem to suggest that the point of the chart is to show that there is a low percentage of insider investing in the U.S. While true, the caption of the plot makes the claim that the plot is meant to show what is happening in foreign stock. The U.S. is thus only a "benchmark" & shouldn't be emphasized. I'd have maken it the same or would attempt to de-emphasize it with a lighter bar or, more likely, another vertical line similar to the 50% line.

economous

hi edward, great blog. i think atom probe is right, the nyt article is making the point that home bias should be blamed on insiders in other countries not on americans' propensity to buy u.s. stocks. "A better measure of home bias would focus only on shares not owned by insiders. Calculated this way, Americans’ home bias would be smaller in the case of almost all foreign stock markets, Professor Warnock said."

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Vimeo and NYU. See my full bio.

Book Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read



Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter

Residues